[wingide-users] Incremental saving.... wingide-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 13
kim at hessianinformatics.com
Wed Feb 26 15:24:01 EST 2014
thats what i mean, install git , and run it locally.
On Feb 26, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Strauch, Rebecca A (DFG) <rebecca.strauch at alaska.gov> wrote:
> I doubt my development would ever go into git unless it was a local/internal version. Git seems great for larger projects, but most likely not worth it for my projects.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wingide-users-bounces at wingware.com [mailto:wingide-users-bounces at wingware.com] On Behalf Of Kim Branson
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:04 AM
> To: wingide-users at wingware.com
> Subject: Re: [wingide-users] Incremental saving.... wingide-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 13
> you can simply create a branch with git, and then correct, or roll back from that branch.
> When you are ready you can merge your branch back to the main, and then push your change sets to the origin. Distributed version control is what this is designed for. Mercurial or Git can do this,
> On Feb 26, 2014, at 11:58 AM, Strauch, Rebecca A (DFG) <rebecca.strauch at alaska.gov> wrote:
>> I wouldn't mind seeing some type of incremental back-up (in separate folder, that clears out after x hours/days), maybe save a copy when you save or Ctrl-S. However, I do rely on the Ctrl-Z (undo) quite a bit for the rolling back. An incremental backup would be for my major screw ups. Unless this is a single-file event though, I could see it getting complicated and large if trying to do this on a project. The files may end up getting out sync with each other, but it would be an emergency recovery.
>> So +1 if it can be added in a user friendly way. Just my two cents.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wingide-users-bounces at wingware.com
>> [mailto:wingide-users-bounces at wingware.com] On Behalf Of Michael Hipp
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:38 AM
>> To: wingide-users at wingware.com
>> Subject: Re: [wingide-users] wingide-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 13
>> On 2/26/2014 11:12 AM, diliup gabadamudalige wrote:
>>> Hi helpful Wing IDE user/expert/developer,
>>> I am not quite used to version control systems. The way that I know
>>> is a simple incremental saving system which i'm used to from a long
>>> time ago. I tried to use the version control system but the way I
>>> understood it is mainly for a lot of people editing the same file.
>>> Can any one out there please help me with a simple step by step guide
>>> as to how I can use this method do to incremental saving on the python project that i'm doing using wing IDE pro..
>>> The project has three files and each one need to be saved
>>> occasionally when ever i do a serious edit. There is no one else
>>> involved in editing. It's only me. I am not very good with command
>>> line stuff. Any help would be appreciated. I watched some videos on
>>> version control systems but couldn't figure out how it was done on Wing IDE. Please pardon my ignorance and help.
>> Some will disagree but I don't think VCS is the right tool for what
>> you're wanting to do. The rule for VCS is "commit only when you have
>> something worthy to commit", not IMHO just when you just want to save a checkpoint in a file's life.
>> What I do is keep my development projects in DropBox* or similar cloud
>> sync service. I edit my merry way. If I need to go back to an earlier
>> version, DropBox will have it available (for a while). This sort of
>> assumes that needing that old version is more rare than routine. (If
>> routine, I'd be curious to know what you're doing.)
>> I do all this along with git, but only commit when I've made a change
>> that is finished and tested.
>> I miss the versioned file system we had on VAX/VMS back in the day.
>> Wing IDE users list
>> Wing IDE users list
> Wing IDE users list
More information about the wingide-users