[wingide-users] RE: Evaluating a Single Function
jon at rayv.com
Mon Oct 1 08:55:35 MDT 2007
What you suggest is a more general way of doing it. However, I do think
that evaluating a single function is a very common action, that should
have its own binding.
(As a good costumer, when presented with two options, I'd like to have
From: Wingware Support [mailto:support at wingware.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 17:07
To: Jonathan Mozes
Cc: wingide-users at wingware.com
Subject: Re: Evaluating a Single Function
Jonathan Mozes wrote:
> I have a python module containing rather long function and class
> definitions. While working on this module, I tend to use the feature
> selecting a number of lines (mostly a few function definitions), and
> evaluating them in the Python Shell Window. When the functions are
> this tends to be tedious.
In general, I'd like a way to select current scope, in a way that
repeating the command selects ever further outward (eg: select local
if/else, then enclosing for loop, then enclosing nested function,
method, class, whole file).
Do you think having that (w/ a key binding) would get you what you want
or do you do this often enough that you'ld want a single binding (or
to avoid actually selecting)?
Wingware | Python IDE
Advancing Software Development
More information about the wingide-users