[wingide-users] Tests in Wing IDE 3.0
Pete
pfein at pobox.com
Mon Nov 19 06:35:54 MST 2007
Lemme add another vote for py.test. I just started using it and it's way
nicer than unittest derrived tests (like nose). Mainly because it doesn't
reek of Java:
unittest (& nose):
self.AssertEquals(x, 'pants')
py.test:
assert x == 'pants'
It's much more convincing when you have to type a few tens or hundreds of such
lines.
py.test has an option to drop into pdb on a failed test, so presumably there's
some machinery wing cold hook into here.
On Tuesday October 2 2007 2:01:55 pm Humberto Diogenes wrote:
> I don't know where are you taking these votes, so here's mine:
> py.test, please. :)
>
> On 02/10/2007, at 11:44, Wingware Support wrote:
> > The Testing tool currently just supports unittest derived tools. It's
> > designed so we can add other types, but we started with just unittest
> > for 3.0. We're taking votes for which to do next...
>
> --
> Humberto Diógenes
> Diginet Brasil
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> Wing IDE users list
> http://wingware.com/lists/wingide
--
Peter Fein || 773-575-0694 || pfein at pobox.com
http://www.pobox.com/~pfein/ || PGP: 0xCCF6AE6B
irc: pfein at freenode.net || jabber: peter.fein at gmail.com
More information about the wingide-users
mailing list