![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
[wingide-users] Re: Wing IDE 1.1b5 on NT4/SP6: Source Browserjpe@archaeopteryx.com jpe@archaeopteryx.comWed, 16 May 2001 23:10:05 -0400 (EDT)
I've reproduced this bug and fixed it in our internal sources. The problem was that a comment followed the 'class _TDirOSI(_TDir):' statement. The fix will be part of our next release; I'm not releasing a patch because of other changes in the modified module. The temporary workaround is to move the comment to another line. Thanks, John On Wed, 16 May 2001, F. GEIGER wrote: > > Hmm, I can't seem to reproduce this. Is there any chance you could send > > me the relevant file? Does TDirOSI appear in the list of all classes? > > _TDirOSI does appear, yes. > > Source attached. > > Regards > Franz > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: jpe@archaeopteryx.com [mailto:jpe@archaeopteryx.com] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2001 01:43 > > An: F. GEIGER > > Cc: wingide-users@archaeopteryx.com > > Betreff: Re: AW: [wingide-users] Wing IDE 1.1b5 on NT4/SP6: Source > > Browser > > > > > > On Tue, 15 May 2001, F. GEIGER wrote: > > > Your patch seems to resolve this issue only partially. > > > > > > An example: I have 2 classes, TDirWin32 and TDirOSI. Both are > > derived from > > > TDir. But only TDirWin32 ist shown as being derived from TDir. > > TDirWin32 was > > > the one derived last, i.e. > > > > Hmm, I can't seem to reproduce this. Is there any chance you could send > > me the relevant file? Does TDirOSI appear in the list of all classes? > > > > Thanks, > > > > John > >
Run by Mailman v 2.0.8 |
|
|
Copyright (c) 2000-2002, Archaeopteryx Software, Inc. Legal Statements | ||